home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
- From: murphycvs@aol.com (MurphyCVS)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"
- Date: 11 Feb 1996 04:18:04 -0500
- Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
- Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com
- Message-ID: <4fkc8c$1gr@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
- References: <4et3p7$79o@cloud9.net>
- Reply-To: murphycvs@aol.com (MurphyCVS)
- NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
-
- hraiser@cloud9.net wrote:
-
- No compiler can compensate for a weak, cumbersome, limited language like
- (Viusal) Basic. Delphi has an excellent environment, but nothing on
- heaven
- or Earth can make me go back to coding Pascal. Smart money is on Latte,
- Borland's upcoming Java based programming environment, based on the Delphi
- front end.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -----------------------------
-
- I just started learning Delphi (easier going than I thought it would be)
- after using ObjectPal in PDOXWIN for some time, and NOW, you say Borland
- is coming out with another type of Language soon... How do developers
- keep up with the learning curves?
-
- Mike
-